Either we all stand up or none of us do. Recently I read comments on the BBC page on Open Borders. One Mark Krikorian of the Center for Immigration Studies expresses this view.
Borders are essential to nationhood. They are the line between “us” and “them”. Without ‘them’ there can be no ‘us’, precluding the possibility of social solidarity.
Scary isn’t it? If we let those foreigners in we’ll be in real trouble.
High falutin’ words but when you cut to the chase its just the same kind of mindless tribalism that has caused human suffering for thousands of years. Get over it. There is no “them” – there’s just “us” on this planet. What precludes social solidarity is drawing imaginary boundaries between members of our community. They look different. They speak different. They’re a different class. They’re black. They’re white. They’re women. They’re Christian. They’re Jews. They’re Muslims. They’re foreigners. Let’s keep them out. Let’s keep them in their place. That way we can know who “we” really are. If this is what “social solidarity” means, we’re better off without it. Social solidarity means looking after each other and caring for our community to the best of our ability – caring for everyone in our community. It might seem like hard work building that understanding. Building and maintaining all those borders is a lot harder and by the way it kills people. Treating people differently because of their nationality is a violation of human rights.
The Center for Immigration Studies has been linked with white supremacist groups in a report by the Southern Poverty Law Center.
RELATED POSTS
The Borders of ScienceSurely something as universally true as science could not have borders? Not in the twenty-first century. Not in the age of the internet. Like the refugees who face immense challenges in getting into Fortress Europe, getting the benefits of science to the poor in developing countries is incredibly difficult. The most well-known case was that of aids drugs and their availability to…
-
An Empowering and Supportive Community LifeIn previous articles we have looked at how Baha'u'llah reforms religious institutions as consultative institutions with a duty to foster human well-being. We have also seen how the individual is framed by Baha'u'llah as an active citizen who is a partner in fostering human well-being. How then does community life change? Sometimes religious community life is viewed as being judgemental, oppressive and divisive. And…
-
The Duty of Kindness and Sympathy Towards Strangers and ForeignersParis in the 1900s It is hardest to write of those things about which we feel most deeply. Today I wish to write about someone whose words and life have profoundly influenced and inspired me. That person is Abdu'l Baha: the son of the founder of the Baha'i Faith and its leader from 1892 to 1921. I wish to address…
-
Imagined foreignnessimage from yoel.info In our modern world, it is often the nation-state that acts as the locus from which conceptions of foreignness arise. It is to one (or more) of the 190-plus countries into which the globe has been carved up that we claim allegiance and tie our identities. Our passports, legal documents that represent our affiliation with a certain…
Hi all,
Thanks for the various comments. Hope to start posting again before too long (have been snowed the last couple of months). Thanks Povery Striken One for the suggestion of the book. I hunted up the abstract and looks pretty interesting. Will see if I can get hold of it. Will let you know if the article gets published.
I have your piece from SSRN . Interesting. You might want to take a look at Peter Spiro’s book, Beyond Citizenship. If your piece gets published in a journal, please send me the citation. Thanks.
Hi. I like the way you write. Will you post some more articles?